| infamous8 said: its not even MGS. Its MGR. They just use the name MGS to sell and market it. Its NOT a main title for MGS because: 1) does not have Solid Snake as the main character 2) will not play like the classic MGS titles 3) does not follow the same story as MGS titles 360 fanboys = owned. |
You're quickly becoming my favorite poster here. E3 isn't E3 unless someone has a mental breakdown, and I'm happy to see it was you. What's even funnier are the people arguing with you that actually believe they can correct your thinking. Bravo sir. You are a god amongst patients.
To join into the fray and keep this lovely post going, let me answer your questions.
1. MGS 2, MGS 3 and MGS: Portable Ops, 3/5 of the MGS titles do not have Solid Snake as the main character. Considering Raiden has already highlighted a Metal Gear Solid game, there really isn't a legitimate reason to think he can't do it again.
2. Agreed to an extent. Raiden uses a blade primarily so it might play similiar to that later section of MGS2. I did like playing that portion. It was fun. However, if you mean it won't be stealth oriented, that's mere speculation. MGS2 was as stealthy as the rest and Raiden was the star. Also you're basing it off MGS4's Raiden, whom we only see during his fights with Vamp. We don't know if he enacts stealthy infiltration tactics outside of those moments, which would have merely been boss fights if playable, and that is when stealth gets shot to hell in MGS anyways.
3. You do not know this. Raiden's story was the highlight of MGS2 and everyone considers that game canon. Raiden's story is in MGS4 also and that too is considered canon. Frankly I can't stand his fucking story in MGS4, so this game is likely not for me, but that doesn't mean it isn't an important part of the MGS storyline. Let's just be thankful it isn't a Johnny Akiba and Meryl Silverburgh game. I shudder at the thought of that.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
