steverhcp02 said:
SHMUPGurus said:
steverhcp02 said:
SHMUPGurus said:
steverhcp02 said:
SHMUPGurus said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
I think Nintendo is breathing a sigh of relief after seeing NATAL in action, that was about as lame as I thought it would be |
Are you kidding me? This is the most awesome thing I've ever seen.
I see myself using my arm to grapple stuff like in Bionic Commando! I hope developers will make good use of this technology, and Microsoft can achieve this for sure (they're billionaires!!!).
|
really? did you see the lag in th emovements? its a cool concept.
ever get frustrated playing online with lag or when framerate drops? i dont see how anyone can get excited about this other than soccer moms who have fat kids.
|
*looks at you signature... interesting information*
*imagines you can't think about the fact that this is still in production*
*takes a deep breath*
There...
|
attack my sig when you know im damn right and not the substanc eof my post. Look at my post history not what console i own, then judge me.
I think its rather juvenile and naieve to see a product demonstrated, get a huge gushing boner over it and then when someone makes valid points based on the FACTUAL ACTUAL PRESENTATION youre only result is "its still in development" thats not a good sign.
|
Seriously, I don't understand how you can be so against this project. Do you hate innovation or something?
When they first showed it with the guy (Kudo I believe his name was), I was a bit skeptical myself because the movement recognition seemed weak, but when that girl played that little tech demo, it was actually working! She was moving in a 3D environnement created in the tech demo with just a little camera. Sure, she seemed a bit excited and missed a few balls, but what do you expect?
And what facts? You saw lag in there? You saw framedrops? What the heck are you talking about?
|
Hate innovation? the cell phone was innovative. The Ipod, the discman, color TV, high speed internet.......putting my hands in fake water is retarded. An interactive CGI character? please, until it can learn, retain and ask you questions its nothing more than a simple recognition software, nothing revolutionary.
All of these ideas are great but why do you think there still isnt an RPG where we can actually type in dialogue and play it however we want? because its improbable if not impossible. Revolutionary? if you call some spasmatic little girl seizing in her living room or some kid moving like hes pinching a turd in quick sand pretending to be godzilla or some middle aged woman dipping her hands in water revolution then we will never see revolution because im sure every soccer mom and every person who needs an epeen to show they hav eteh latest tech will get this, show it to their friends and then theyll go and play Crackdown, Halo, Mass Effect or Alan Wake and never use it again.
|
Cool beans. We could discuss about all this impossibility thing here, but it's not the topic at hand, is it? I didn't say a thing about it being revolutionary by the way.
We've seen a SMALL GLIMPSE of what could be an amazing collective project. I say we all wait to see what else developers can do with this. There will be haters, but also believers I expect.
