Onyxmeth said:
dcIKeeL said:
Onyxmeth said:
I don't see what's so particularly diverse about that list of games. I mean we've got three racing games(two of which are from the same franchise), and a shit ton of games primarily about shooting enemies(inclusing two first person shooters). On top of that, the list of upcoming games that are supposed to continue the diversity are mostly made up of sequels of currently released PS3 games(Uncharted 2, Gran Turismo 5) and a game cut from the same cloth as Heavenly Sword(God of War III), so how does that make the console more diverse? I would think sequels would be the least likely titles to diversify a console lineup.
Frankly, if we're talking about diverse lineups, your answer is the Wii. Why even argue this?
|
I agree with mostly everything except the final statement. I honestly don't think a truly diverse console library exists in this gen as of now. The wii is very high on casual but very low on hardcore as of now. Many games on the ps3/360 libraries are completely absent on the Wii or of comparble low quality.
Again, I don't think any console has a truly diverse library.
|
I don't equate the words "casual" and "hardcore" the same way you do, so I won't judge the Wii's library in those eyes. Also, the quality of said games is far too subjective to be a legitimate talking point when we're discussing variety.
You and I are on two completely different thought patterns, so we'll probably never reach a middle ground. You continue to think your way and I'll continue mine.
|
Well, I have my quibbles with defining hardcore and casual as well. I usually assume the popular stance in these type of arguments just for the purpose of people understanding what I mean. Care to share your definition of casual and hardcore?
