Next-gen console war: The verdict by mcvuk.com

[sieanr]

MikeB said:
@ sieanr

"You think the PS3 can render 2.25x as many pixels as the 360?" You answer; "Well, the thing about 1080p is...."

The way you put it, the question would be strange considering both consoles can output 1080p resolutions. And when addressing 1080p specifically, IMO it has to be clear what you are referring to exactly, FullHD or 1080p in general. IMO technically the PS3 is capable of doing a lot more in 1080p than the XBox 360 technically can, without wanting to attach an absolute figure on how much more powerful I consider the PS3 to be. This would depend on variable issues, like game engine design and platform specific optimizations.

If you are unable to understand my postings, please don't get upset. In the middle ages you would have had a hard time as well, explaining to people the earth isn't flat.

No, I understood it just fine.

A guy asked you if you thought the PS3 could render games at 1080p better than the 360, and you responded with something completely unrelated to this. Go back to that original thread where other people said the exact same thing, the one you conviently left not long after this was posted;

 

Final-Fan said:

Entroper said:
Point of Clarification: 1920x1080 = 2.25 * (1280x720). Just so we're clear, you're stating that the PS3 has the potential to render 2.25 times as many pixels as the Xbox 360 with the same effects. Yes? I'm not debating anything in this post, just asking.

MikeB said:
@ Entroper

FullHD is 1920 x 1080, 1080p is 1,080 lines of vertical resolution progressively scanned, so resolution can vary depending on horizontal resolution.

 

Funny, that just so happens to be another thing you've ignored