Alterego-X on 30 May 2009
Malstrom is always right, except when he isn't.
Seriously, all of his articles and his whole disruption analysis is correct, it just explains everything.
He was wrong a few times in blog posts, but these are just blog posts, I don't think that he taks them that seriously either.
Also, I think the haters overreact his arrogance, because it is just his successful writing strategy, if he wouldn't be that arrogant, you wouldn't read him. The 2006 article "Why Wii Won" made him popular, but the 2008 article "How Obama Loses" article didn't take away this popularity. People listen to arrogant, prophetic claims, especially when they are right, not discussions and opinions.
