Staude said:
SO you are saying it has worse multiplayer judging on gametypes it doesn't have instead of comparing the ones it does have with the equals of the other games ? That's like saying fable 2 sucks cause it's multiplayer is terrible. Because it has none. And i also disagree with the singleplayer thing. Your points are usually just an attempt to spin something in your favour, but this time you didn't only fail to spin it you managed to horribly void your own point. |
Words cannot describe how badly you have just failed. I didn't mention online at all in my original post. If you are referring too my agreement with the OP and assuming I was agreeing with his online points, all he said was "the online options were good."
It has a worse single player than either Gears game. The story is not as good (though the first Gears story isn't great either) and you never care (and often dont remember the names of) about the characters. In addition to this, Killzone 2 has no local co-op of any kind, something that has become a staple of shooters. It's funny you should mention Fable 2, as it DOES have local co-op.
It's really quit simple. Once you get past the very impressive graphics, Killzone 2 has a good, but not great, single player campaign.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS







