Lafiel on 29 May 2009
@ griffinA )
Darwin always made clear that what he was writing was a theory and hypothizing based on countless of examples he found in the nature.
Malstrom on the other hand is talking in "facts". I can related to many of his statements, but because he never seems to use indications of opinion based speech it makes me feel like he is "preaching" it instead of presenting and discussing it.
The "nobody but Nintendo (and maybe Sega) got the D-pad right" part makes this all too clear.
