By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Munkeh111 said:
Soundwave said:

Why should Square-Enix have any allegiance to anyone? They're a 3rd party publisher. Fact is Sony can't dominate the competetion when they don't have an unfair advantage in third party support like they did on the PS1 and PS2. It's not Square-Enix's job to prop up a third place company.

Exclusives should be provided by the console maker, most games on the SNES-Genesis era were multiplatform as well yet neither system had any problem forging their own identity because they had system-defining 1st party exclusives.

Because Sony own like 9% of them? Or because Sony had some sort of contract with them, which they ripped up (this is rumoured)

Sony does not own 9% of SE....They hold Stock which makes them inverstors not owners...And it was a snake move to try and get some one on the SE Director Board to Monopolize them with out having to outright buy them...they are a minor share holder and their only benefit would be to sell SE stock when they could make a profit....