By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
konnichiwa said:
RolStoppable said:
konnichiwa said:
Gnizmo said:
Using Patchter as your source is a seriously desperate move. He couldn't predicy the effects of gravity on a bowling ball.

Desperate maybe but he was one of the few analysts whoes thoughts become true.


Auch ein dummes Huhn findet mal ein Korn.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.


True, but when Patcher said that no one believed him, Analysts were writing articles that Wii would fail.

I am not a patcher lover but he said something a year ago that became true something that at that time was non-believable.


From reading the opening post I get the impression that Pachter predicted a short lived success for the Wii based on the wrong reasons, because "it's a cheap Nintendo console". Maybe he was right that the Wii would sell well (but he for sure didn't expect it to do that well), but he doesn't really know why it's selling. His prediction was a lucky shot.

Read here why the Wii is really selling so well, "Why Wii won" posted on November 20th 2006:

http://thewiikly.zogdog.com/author.php?author=8


 I got the impression Patcher said that the Wii would sell for sure one year well. And that is more than the most do.

And thx for the article but their were still a lot of analysts who predicted wrong.

True his prediction was a lucky shot but that is typical for long term predicitions.