PS3 falling bad?

[ironman]

Spankey said:

ironman said:

Spankey said:
hmm... an interesting thought just occurred to me.
I've spent roughly double so far on games for my PS3 than I paid for the console.
If I'd have bought a 360 instead and bought roughly the same amount on games, I'd have spent almost 4 times as much on games as I did on the console.

weird.

anyway, OT, PS3 falling bad?
So you mean it falls in being bad? i.e. doing well? in that case, I agree with you.

Thats because the 360 actually has good games that are worth the money! LMAO     BTW how does the PS3 "fall" in being bad? And how is it doing well? 

 

lolol!

 

but @ underlined, it's like if something sucks terribly, it's a double negative which actually when you break it down means that it's terrible at sucking, which means it actually rocks.

Pedantic I know, but worth a mention I thought.

As for it doing well, it's still selling games and hardware. if it wasn't selling either of those, it would be doing badly. IMO

...You sir, need a grammer lesson. A double negative is a statement like "I don't like no free cheese"  this phrase is perfectly acceptable and is NOT a double negative " I can't stand it when the PS3 fails" so your logic is flawed. Dude, just because a console is still selling games and hardware does not mean it isn't failing, that would be like Chryslers PT cruiser, this car is failing to sell enough...but it's not failing because it's still selling, and they are still selling parts for them. See how asinine that is?