Is 360 The Standard Bearer This Gen.

[Squilliam]

CGI-Quality said:

Squilliam said:

CGI-Quality said:
In quality, that's subjective. In amount, the PS3 will never have as many games as the 360, but quantity =/= quality. As far as graphics, that's subjective too, although I'd rate Killzone 2 Console Graphics King ATM, but again, that's just me.

Basically, you asked an interesting question, but it can only be answered subjectively, not factually, unless you mean game amount.

The Xbox 360 has both the quality and quantity advantage for the overall library. The PS3 still has very few top flight exclusives.

Uummm, in your opinion, once again. Like I said, that is subjective, NOT factual.

See this is why I don't engage in converation with you anymore Squill, it's never positive, and usually, very one-sided on your part.

Actually its not my opinion, as im subjective and biased then an objective comparaison of subjective opinion, in this case its metacritic is what I use.

If I had to post a personal opinion the PS3 and Xbox 360 would be relatively equal for me, but I don't like doing that because its too subjective.

@non_suer: Isn't left 4 dead really only half a game since theres no single player to speak of? So therefore its judged only on that aspect, so the individual component of multi-player may be better but the overall package of killzone 2 may also be considered better. (Better means more awesome sauce per dollar, averaged over many many people)