CGI-Quality said:
deadt0m said:
CGI-Quality said:
There are actually plenty of differences and both systems have strengths and weaknesses and it shows in their top tier games. No myth about that.
And even if Blu-ray doesn't contribute to the look of a game, I'm not sure if that's been proven false though, it DOES contribute to lots more content within a game. MGS4's main advantage was Blu-ray, so it does account for something, which does matter.
Regardless, the article makes several nice points, even if I disagree with a few other ones. |
Bold is 100% false. It contributes NOTHING to the content within a game, it contributes to the amount of content that can be fit on one disc. I am in no way denying that MGS4 could not be pulled off in one-disc format on 360. But it could easily be pulled off in multi-disc format, thus meaning that Blu-Ray in no way enhances the amount of content available, only the number of discs that content is packaged on.
|
Can you prove what I said is "100% false"? End of the day, it's not a "myth" that Blu-ray DOES contribute to gaming.
|
I already admitted what it contributes to gaming. It allows developers to make gigantic games on one disc. That doesn't mean more content overall, that is my point. Is having a game on one disc preferable to multiple discs? Yes, of course. It doesn't mean that a multi-disc version won't work, though. Blu-ray provides an advantage, but that advantage is not in terms of graphics or OVERALL content, simply storage capacity, which is still nice.
