By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
highwaystar101 said:
CHYUII said:
highwaystar101 said:
 

Huh, science makes blunders ey? It seems to me that science looks for the truth and when it finds something worng they come clean and carry on the search. Not blunders, the search for the truth. Whan was the last time religious people admitted the mistakes they have made and carried on the search for truth? I know Christians who still think the earth is 6000 years old despite all that pesky evidence showing it is FAR older and that a flood wiped out everything except 8 people, which would have killed every plant on earth so the herbivore animals could not survive.

Here is you seven examples of what you would call macro-evolution... read this, 26 examples including... http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html

Evidence of reptiles evolving into mammals

Evidence of human evolution from primates

Evidence that whales are evolved from land mammals

Vestigial tails, a left over gene from an older species

Snakes showing reptilian legs during early development... another leftover from an earlier species

The full evolution of paramecium (ehich co-incidently destroys slimebeasts bacteria arguements)

A whole heap of fossil records showing full evolution

 

Only fool would not accept it after read that site and these examples are just a few. Heck I can think of dozens of examples not on that site.

 

Now, Can you proove to me that god exists with seven examples.. Not just any god I mean YOUR GOD SPECIFICALLY...

 

 

Also can you be more specific?

I could say, "Evidence that King Kong is the Supreme Ruler of my Left Nostril and that would mean anything."

Or a lawyer could go to court and say, "Jury! I have Evidence that this woman killed Justin Timberlake!" The jury would not take his word for it he/she would need to be more specifc. They would ask, "What evidence."

A creationist could say, "Evidence that God created the Universe." And it wouldn't mean anything until they showed you what they believed.

Just give me one of your examples and we will take it from there. Be more specific, please.

OK, you didn't click the link I gave did you, that explains more.

Evidence of reptiles evolving into mammals

http://www.bobpickett.org/evolution_of_mammals.htm

Bit long to post here, but it explains where the orgins of mammals lie, it has a lot of strong proof.

 

Evidence of human evolution from primates

http://anthropologynet.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/fossil-hominid-skulls.jpg

This is an image of homind skulls in sequential order

 

Evidence that whales are evolved from land mammals

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/03/4/l_034_05.html

"Another, slightly more recent form, called Ambulocetus, was an amphibious animal. Its forelimbs were equipped with fingers and small hooves. The hind feet of Ambulocetus, however, were clearly adapted for swimming. Functional analysis of its skeleton shows that it could get around effectively on land and could swim by pushing back with its hind feet and undulating its tail, as otters do today."

 

Vestigial tails, a left over gene from an older species

Feel that bone just above your bum that supports macro evolution. It's like a small unfunctional tail, it is a leftover feature of earlier primate days. Pretty convincing proof that we were once more primitive primates.

 

Snakes showing reptilian legs during early development... another leftover from an earlier species

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/03/000317051940.htm

"Washington, D.C. -- Appearing like the punchline to an evolutionary riddle, a new fossil snake with legs has emerged from 95 million year-old deposits near Jerusalem. Its sedimentary surroundings suggest a seafaring lifestyle for this ancient reptile, but its advanced anatomy could overturn a current theory about the marine origin of snakes."

 

The full evolution of paramecium (ehich co-incidently destroys slimebeasts bacteria arguements)

http://www.cns.fr/externe/English/Actualites/Presse/011106.html

again to long to post

 

A whole heap of fossil records showing full evolution

Yeah, just go on the net and look, there are many.

 

 

I've been specific for most and it's obvious for the others. So can I have my seven now?


That's a lot to look at I will give it a good looking over the week and get back to you.

In the mean time have a good day.