The myth of the more powerful console.

[starcraft]

bugrimmar said:

starcraft said:
I think that objectively Killzone 2 has better graphics than Halo 3.

I also think this is due to the far higher production budget and far longer production cycle the former had.

I disagree. Again, as I mentioned, this is apples vs. oranges. The art style between the two games is like Earth vs Mars. Not a correct comparison.

At least, however, you're not saying "because the PS3 is more powerful", meaning you just simply prefer realistic graphics over artistic.

Don't get me wrong, I think the artstyle argument has merit.  But the argument you are making precludes ANY game from having a graphical advantage as anyone can say the like the art-style of the lessor game better.

There are some metrics by which we can say one game has better graphics than others.  I will say I saw more glitches in KZ2's campaign than Halo 3's.