| ranzchic said: I ask this to the haters who are still convinced that the Wii is a fad, waggle sucks, etc. in light of recent sales figures. Just so we don't get predictable responses, let's say that the majority resources will be shifted to the market leader away from the HD consoles. All the games you see now that are announced for both the PS3/360 suddenly becomes hard to come by, except for first party titles and a few companies doing the big-fish-small-pond corporate strategy(ala Capcom with the Gamecube). What would you do? Are you willing to embrace the waggle and your old Nintendo Overlords that was rehired? Would you become one of those creepy Gamecube holdouts? Are you going to stick to the true graphical powerhouse, the PC? Would you skip this entire generation entirely? And please, don't be frothing and give knee jerk reactions. I am not proclaiming a Wii win, just presenting a hypothetical question. |
maybe...
the interesting thing is that for sure nintendo will be around 30% of home market.
in the end there are two ways:
1)believe in nintendo when they say that their market is different from ps3/x360 one...
2)put wii and ps3/x360 on the same category.
if 1 then nintendo like ds is doing something totally different so we can't compare with others.
if 2 then nintendo is the only winner.
IMO is 2.
the struggle ps3 vs x360 makes only nintendo as the winner of the current gen already.
a "gamecube2" is smashing the "pseudo-super-powerfull-pc/consoles!!!!!!
like in ds case users base is the most important thing for third parties ...
full hd still prices high,hardcore games doesn't really care about resolution or poligony count...
casual gamers the same...
people simply looking for fun games,
so
"graphic battle" between ps3 and x360 is totally useless...
the same "media battle" and "pc-like features battle".....
I like nintendo approach,
all that not concern game is an accessory that you can use/install or not.
ps3 and x360 in the end are "simil pc" ...
