I think is where they get the 7/10 from....
This is from the review...
"After an interesting start, however, inFamous loses its way considerably in the middle third, and certain things begin to dawn on you. If you rub away the labels, for instance, most of the abilities Cole can deploy in attack are just analogues for traditional third-person weaponry. The default zap attack is a rifle round, the heavier one is a rocket launcher, the grenade is a grenade, and the precision shot is a sniper scope with slow-motion."
It seems to me that they didnt find it so innovating and compare it to GeoW and other TPS saying it isn't as good as those. They also didnt like the "protect something" missions. Is it wrong to do that? I don't know I haven't played the full game.
The reviews are only there to give people an idea of how a game is. Everyone has a different opinion so of course some reviewers might love it and others might not so much. Look how many opinions are different on this site.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
