I don't quite understand.
Sony used this guys patents when Immersion sued them?
Sony lost that lawsuit yes?
Sony paid lots of money....
Now Thorner, seeing that the lawsuit was worth that much, is now suing Sony because he sold his patents (thorugh PDP?) to Sony for too little money?
----
Have I got that right? if so it doesn't sound like a worthy lawsuit unless there is some proof that trickery was involved when Sony paid for the patents.








