By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
megaman79 on 19 May 2009
Edit Thread

jv103 said:
I think there is around a 90% chance that Pelosi is lying -she had everything to gain to pretend she was unaware. There's probably a 0% chance of the CIA lying. I mean the president does appoint the CIA director (correct?) and information about Iraq having WMDs was quashed from the CIA themselves (see proof regarding yellow cake purchases in africa- pbs cutting edge) while other intelligence agencies (who were biased bcoz of political involvement, see PM Blair's involvement in MI6 intel edits or Cheney's constant CIA visits demanding some "proof" for the Iraq war -pbs again) lied about Iraq having WMDs.

Even though this is the case, I still have a hard time believing the CIA would like - not to mention I don't think they would need to because I beleive Pelosi's "bleeding heart" is an act to continue to represent her district. I think she feeds on power (every poltician) any way she can.

Verdict: Pelosi (at least I hope so - if the CIA is lying, God help us)

 

fixed. Do your research please, the rest of the world did and that's why so many countries were not "alies".



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.