I recall an argument I was involved in on Brawl's wall...
http://www.vgchartz.com/games/wall.php?id=6962
Smashchu2 posted 17/01/2009, 07:39
@MontanaHatchet:
Again, it depends on what we are going to call legs. Let's take these two games. You claim both have strong legs, but one is about to overtake another due to legs. With this in mind, it may be questionable to say Halo 3 has great legs. If it did, why is it slowing so much? Why is Smash Brothers about to overtake it? The titles we attribute to legs have stayed on the charts for 40, 60, even 100 weeks. 35 is a little weak in comparison. Brawl has legs because it is staying in the charts. Halo 3 struggled to keep head above water.
Titles with legs make their sale in long term, not short term. Brawl has stayed strong and has stayed longer. Halo 3 came with a strong burst and tried to keep up. In this sense, I would say Brawl had(has) legs and Halo 3 did not. Truthfully, I would definably not say Halo 3 had great legs. It really didn't.
---
lmao.
