Evolution Forum

[Rath]

thanny said:

highwaystar101 said:

thanny said:
I know that this is about Evolution, which starts with a single cell, and can not explain how life began in the first place...

but how can all these scientists who are so sure evolution is true still have absolutely no clue about how life actually began? No evolutionist has even come close to being able to explain it. it is simple not possible for life to create itself. Richard Dawkins himself acknowledges this, and even he says there is evidence in the details of molecular biology you can find evidence of some sort of designer.

Out of interest, who of you who believe in evolution also believe life created itself? and for that matter, who believe in the big bang? because im interested to know why you actually believe that

I understand evolution, that is correct in my view. No creator though, life formed by itself (because who created the creator, it's a logical paradox, one which discounts one). As for Big bang, the theory is far from complete, why every week I seem to read something new about it, such as big bounce and so on. The big bang happened but we are from from understanding what really happened. But at least we are exploring it and I'm sure instituions like CERN feel as though they are on the right tracks due to the course of their research.

 

 

Theres such a huge difference though, between evolution and big bag/ how life began. Evolution has evidence for it, which is why many people believe in it.

The other two... It is a pretty well known law of physics that energy cannot be created or destroyed, and yet you believe that everything came from nothing?

From a singularity, there is a difference. In any case the laws of physics would not have existed in the same way in the very very early universe.

  apart from that, it is scientifically impossible for life to create itself.

You should probably show your research that proves this to the thousands of scientists studying abiogenesis, they'd be most interested.

 Darwin believed that life started from a single cell, right. At the time it was believed that a single cell was fairly simple... It is known now, though, that one single cell is infinitely complex.

Err no. Not even the universe is infinitely complex. And while a single cell is quite complex, a single cell would also not have been the very start of life. The start of life would have been something more like this (probably not exactly like that mind). A simple replecating molecule. 

The idea that it just came together by chance is no more believable then the idea of someone making it. Believing in the big bang/ random creation of life is essentially a religion.

 Chance is a very poor word to use, we came together by a process determined by natural laws as well as chance.

(sorry if i sounded like i was 'attacking' you, just questioning)