TheRealMafoo said:
We had Ron Paul on most all major debates, all over the internet, and so little votes. Options are out there. People just don't care to learn about them. As for the last line, if you take our liberties away, the President can condemn thousands to death, and not care to say anything. He can do it strictly because he feels like it. Neither is better then the other. We need real change, and this isn't it.. the only change we have, is the same, but more of it. |
There are always options, but the other guys can afford much better marketing. And as somebody that loves the free market so much, you should know that good business sense and marketing is what takes somebody to the top. The free market just doesn't feel that it can benefit as greatly by buying Ron Paul as having democrats and republicans run things, since they have already purchased both parties. Why risk so much money pushing a libertarian or independant when you have two perfectly good parties in the garage already? I know you love the free market, and with good reason. But they are the reason that we only have two terrible choices shoved down our throat every election cycle. It's just good business.

You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.









