| The_vagabond7 said: I'm not really saying that a liberty stealing socialist is a great president, but if I had to pick one or the other, I go with Obama. I'm only 24 so I've never actually had a chance to be proud of our president. And I don't really blame american's for picking crappy presidents, I blame a broken system where in private industry buys the candidates of their choice to shove down our throats, and americans get to pick between two candidates that for all intents and purposes are pretty much identical in practice (though not in speech). But that's neither here nor there (I will end up derailing my own topic very quickly with this).
Anytime a person can condemn thousands to death and say "Jesus made me do it", that person should be labeled insane and locked up. It's the Nuremberg defense for the religiously inclined.
|
We had Ron Paul on most all major debates, all over the internet, and so little votes. Options are out there. People just don't care to learn about them.
As for the last line, if you take our liberties away, the President can condemn thousands to death, and not care to say anything. He can do it strictly because he feels like it.
Neither is better then the other. We need real change, and this isn't it.. the only change we have, is the same, but more of it.
