By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Staude said:
Squilliam said:
Wierd is relative, but its definately a quality that can be ascribed to a game. So a quality game can be wierd if wierd is the quality you're going for? Funny isn't it, all the debates we have here about sales vs quality and the word quality isn't even a defined concept.

 

If you hadn't noticed, most things people proclaim on this site are speculation and/or rumor based.

 

But i agree. Some can find a game of great quality while another person will find the same game a piece of shit. I believe that we're generally looking for the common opinion in these situations and/or any that agrees with ours :p

Unfortunately..

Anyhow whilst I really have loved several badly reviewed games, my hit/miss ratio as the scores get higher as an aggregate definately improve quite markedly. I.E. if I had to live in just the 90+ list on metacritic for gaming I would probably be happier than at the 80-89 level, in spite of having far far fewer games to play.

 



Tease.