Hello! I'd like a PS3 for $199.

[Akvod]

Khuutra said:

Akvod said:

Majin-Tenshinhan said:

But it's not. I don't want bluray. Why should it be worth $200 to me when I don't want it? I'm not buying a blu-ray player, because I don't want a blu-ray player. I'm looking to buy a games console. The blu-ray is a non-factor in my purchase.

But that's like me saying that a diamond should be worth a penny (or free) because I can care less about it. If you're saying that you believe that a PS3 is worth $199 I understand, but all I'm saying is that based on the current prices of things, it doesn't make sense that the PS3 should be valued at only $199 when you look at its features. Even if you don't care about the other features, currently the PS3 is being sold with those features, and Sony spent money adding those features in the factory.

THis still means absolutely nothing when consumers determine value. If they don't care about a feature, it isn't worth the money it cost to produce.

As I said before, I understand if it's the demand that Majin's placing on the PS3. However as I said before, it's ridiculous to realisticly think that the real world value of a diamond, PS3, etc is at the rockbottom prices we both provided. People look at everyone's demand and value of a object, not only one person's. So people do believe that shiny rocks are worth a shit load of cash, and stand alone Bluray players $199, and I say that I don't think that PS3's are currently being valued at $199 by consumers (although it obviously needs to be cheaper due to its sales).

So to clear my posts up, I'm not trying to tell Majin what he should value the PS3, I'm just stating that I believe in the general consumer's eyes I don't think that it's being valued at $199. Sorry for any confusion caused by me.