By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dcIKeeL on 17 May 2009
Edit Thread
headshot91 said:
dcIKeeL said:
headshot91 said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
dcIKeeL said:
twingo said:
360 cant run the same amount of physics PS3 can, it cant have worlds as big/detailed.

 

 I'm soooo tired of this nonsense!! Do you sony drones truly believe that in the same generation 1 particular system is so advanced that whole games can't be replicated on the competition? Especially since the core technology for both systems is the SAME because, gee idk, they were developed by the SAME GUY!!?!?

Besides, last gen, all you sony fanboys were so quick to dismiss graphical prowess when the sony platform was clearly inferior, as opposed to now, where all people hear is, "wait until blank game and you'll see the true power of ps3 and its cell". The truth is graphics are nice, but they dont make the game, they compliment it. and like aussiegecko said: "its just a marketing gib".

Which ever system is graphically superior is only slightly superior, not 1-2 generations superior. BTW, when looking at pure specs, 360 slightly edges ps3...sooo quit the trolling u tarts

And yet ps3 game stand out more in graphic department such as Uncharted 1 and 2 KZ2 GT5 MGS4 and heavyrain.

 

First of all i think twingo is right about the physics area, ps3 is more avanced in that respect than the 360. no need to call him a sony drone.

You are misguided when looking at pure specs as apart from being , i think, quite subjective, on the technical aspects anyway, when looking at what you get in the actual console e.g. wifi, blu ray player, internet etc, the ps3 trumps the 360 in that repect. PLus the 7 spe's do mean that ps3 is better than the 360 for physics programs. You stop trolling eh?

 

You sir, are retarded. Where does this come from: when looking at what you get in the actual console e.g. wifi, blu ray player, internet etc, the ps3 trumps the 360 in that repect. PLus the 7 spe's do mean that ps3 is better than the 360 for physics programs. Whose talking about console value?? My comment and this thread is strictly about graphical power, and when i say specs i mean the 360's and ps3's respective technological specifications, as in bandwith, memory distribution, processing power, etc...understand? And having more spe's does not  deem it superior, as whats more important than the number of units, is each units efficiency at doing what they do and they're respective limitations and overall limits when looked at as a whole. I understand you'd jump of a bridge for some company who doesnt give 2 tarts what u want and therefore felt the need to state a completely irrelevant comment (which i agree with) about console value in order to gain what u perceived to be an upperhand, but guess what? You, heard about trolling, yes, no? Look it up, ur it!

 

ok, lets deal with this in order.

Just quoting you for a min here :

Word of advice, grow up and be objective to everything, argue with logic not emotion and personal preference, 

Your post automatically fails by your rules, as you have insulted me, and argued using emotive words.

Secondly, I was saying about technological aspects that people can pull numbers out of anywhere, but it seems that overall the ps3 is more powerful than the 360.

Thirdly, I don't know ehere you got the "having more spe's does not deem it superior" bit from, as when talking about TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS e.g. physics, the more spe's make the ps3 more than capable of beating the 360 in that respect, so that argument fails. Just talk to ghostbusters dev team for example. 

Also, I don't know where you come from with your primitive ideas, but I would never "jump off a bridge" for any company, your ideas are just absurd, nasty and confrontational.

I couldn't stop you from forming any subjective opinion over the tech specs of either consoles, so I just put a point in, its more relevant than calling people tarts.

Look up the meaning  of a rational arguement and come back to me eh?

 

 

 awww, we've got a special little one dont we. I can choose to spew my emotions whenever i want as long as they don't interfere with my argument and cloud my judgement. My argument is sound, and it isnt poisoned by any emotion, when i call people tarts and retards and use, jump of a bridge references it is simply to put my opinion of you into perspective. My opinions can be whatever they want and sadly mines and anyone elses are non negotiable so they cannot be called an argument. BTW,just because you aren't using emotive words and tones in your arguments doesnt mean they arent being fueled by emotion. I know you are not as stupid as your arguments make you seem and i;m reasoning that your emotions and personal preferences are clouding your judgement or you're simply choosing to ignore facts. You can like whatever you want, but when you start arguing facts leave your feelings at the door.

I still dont see why you included console value into your argument, since it wasn't a point I or anyone else was contending and didn't compliment the argument of the ps3 being more graphically advanced than the 360 or not. You're simply saying it seems that overall the ps3 is more powerful than the 360. Really headshot, why does it seem that way, hmmm???