Non Sequor said:
The strength of the Constitution comes from the fact that it represented a set of compromises between competing concerns. It lays out the basic structure of our government, but it doesn't dictate the compromises that need to be made now. Everyone interprets the Constitution in a way that supports their beliefs. That's because the Cons titution does not dictate the course of action for government, only it's basic structure and ideals. Elements of it support both sides of debates because elements of both sides of debates went into it. With all due respect to John Adams, his statement that freedom can never be restored is plainly false. Prohibition was repealed. The Sedition Act which he signed and which is generally regarded as blatantly unconstitutional was allowed to expire. It's easy to say "Look! Constitution! Listen to me!" and think that people should be obligated to agree with you but it's never been that easy. People have different ideas about how it should be interpreted. Basically it comes down to the fact that you can't tell people how to feel. That's part of democracy. Call people on their bullshit, but don't expect them to be obligated to listen to you. If people want something that's stupid, they'll find out in time. |
Well I have three questions for you.
1. do you think it's the governments job to protect us from ourselves?
2. Do you think the reform we are talking about is to protect us from ourselves?
3. Are you for this reform laws?







