Staude said:
So because he lies and twists ps3 is a brag platform ? that makes sense.
I'll explain this to you as i hope you'll actually bother to read what i write.
1. You can't designate ram to a model. What they said was that their ps2 model had 5000 polygons while their ps3 one has 20.000. In comparison a fps on a pc with same specs as the ps2 has char models of around 1000 polygons or less. A reason i was pretty impressed when they said that. A normal model today probably has around 10 k polygons. .. Or maybe 20 k is the standard i'm not sure. I haven't worked on one of the newest engines yet.
2. The part about the uncharted animations is that hes saying the whole game as a whole has 11.000 animations. That's fine. But each char has 1 animation running at all times. This while Uncharted has 30 animations running on 1 char because they used the spus to overlap their rendering and animations sequences making some of the most realistic movements you've ever seen in a video game. It's a very big difference. One that he ignored the last 3 times i explained it to him.
And again. The ps3 is used by scientists and the processor is used in the worlds fastest computer. Don't you think they would opt for the much cheaper 360 if it had the same level of processing power ? |
1. Tell me why that would concern any gamer? Do you hear Microsoft saying Halo 3 models have 50.000k polygons and halo 2 only 1.000? Those numbers are made up btw, so don't quote me on that, it's just an example. When game graphics are a let down, Sony tends to say why it is so superior, and convince players that it actually shows how good the PS3 is.
2. This is the same thing again. Bragging bragging bragging. Do people actually see the difference if there's one or 30 animations running at once? And one of the games that still has the best animations is.... Dead or Alive 4. I don't care if it has one or one million animations running at once.
3. (the scientists part) That's because the PS3 Cell can be assigned to specific tasks while the X360 CPU is more based on general purpose processing. Has nothing to do with the PS3 being so much stronger. And yet again I ask myself, why is scientists using the PS3 relevant to gaming?
I guess this reply you gave me only proves my point about the bragging part.....
Truth does not fear investigation







