Cage: Heavy Rain not possible on Xbox 360

[Staude]

RAZurrection said:

You mustn't have played resisistance 2. It's in every way and form many times more advanced than call of duty 4.

I have played it and numerous reviews confirmed it wasn't as technically abled, it's surprising that Resistance doesn't run at 60fps given it's exclusive, but then Insomniac isn't as talented as Infinity Ward.

Cod 4 has like 20 players online. Resistance 2 has 60 players online.

Cod 4 does not really have co-op. Resistance 2 has 8 player co-op

Practically all of cod 4 are in closed or limited enviroments while resistance 2 takes place in huge open enviroments

Resistance 2 is far more advanced than cod4. And some aspects look better. However, that does not equal technical superiority. The other things does.

that chap would have to get his code to run on two entirely different systems. While he may be better, theres an equal chance that he is more generalised and doesn't know as much about either as one who specialises would.

Doesn't matter how many systems the game ultimately comes out for, it's a case of visuals over visuals and in many cases CoD4 (and onwards) will always look and run better than Resistance 1 & 2, Battlefield Bad Company (and onwards) will always look better than MAG. At the end of the day it's talent that counts better for visuals then exclusivity. 

...... Seriously ? lol. I mean.. Comon man. Can't you hear how rediculous what you're saying comes off ? You have no idea how game development and engines work do you ?

Battlefield bad company will look better than mag ? congrats. Mag only has 256players online at the same time. Do you know what that means? everything that happens in the map has to be sent to the play (information) and everything the player does has to be sent to the server and then to the other players. In other word. time that 256 times and you have mag.

The mag developer said it pretty well himself.

In call of duty, you'll hear some action going on and you'll know it's scripted.. but in this game, you can hear explosions in the distance.. you can actually go over there to check out whats going on.. and help your team if you want to.

Show me a game with a animation system half as advanced as uncharted. The whole game is streamed and drake has more than 30 animations running on him alone at any given time.

Animations? The Club, Assasins Creed, it's sequel, any 3D fighting game, any Capcom games cutscenes ae about a generation ahead of U2.

Visials? Gears of War 1 & 2, Killzone 2, RE5, Lost Planet 2, Rage, Alan Wake, Assassins Creed 2, Saboteur.

lol NO they're a generation behind. Visually I don't really think that all of your games does the trick. In particular the gears of war games. I'm not sure if you've played through uncharted. Cause it sounds like you dont. All the games you mentioned above, Does NOT have that amount of things happening animations wise at once.

Infact ALL of the games you mentioned are a generation behind uncharted. I'm not talking abotu cutscenes. But INGAME. Yes, ingame naughty dog had around 30 animations Running on drake, at all times. All of the games you mention has 1. And it shows. You are confusing things. More than that, cutscenes in uncharted were all mo-capped. You know what that means ? you can't have cutscenes a generation ahead of it because it's the closest to real people you're gonna get. And it shows. But i was only discussing ingame. When you are moving around.

Gears 1 does certainly not look as good as uncharted and gears 2 is a big maybe. Especially because it's not as technically advanced as uncharted. .. I'll give a maybe to resident evil 5. It didn't seem very impressive from the demo. But games don't often do. It felt stiff and while it might have better textures, again animation wise it's behind. All games are. There is no game on the market that does anything near uncharted animation wise.

Killzone 2 also has impressive animations. But for slightly different reasons.

You forgot to write "Unreal engine 3 multiplatform games"

 

No, all of them. The PS3 is essentially crippled for MP games and not limited to just UE3 games, but it does appear to be more crippled in that engine than others. It's very interesting how the PS3 can't handle this generations most popular engine properly.

The issue with multiplatforms are that the developers won't invest time into the ps3 and just drops everything on the ppu.

It's not the developers fault Sony built a console that wasn't future proof.

lol... No seriously. Lol

However, when they start tapping the spus.. that's where they find out about the juice.

And yet multiplatform games continue to outshadow them, i'm beginning to think that Sony wasn't prepared for the onslaught of third parties outdoing them in the visuals front, this is what happens when your lead platform has development libraries and proper tools.

Outshadow what ? theres no third party developed games that look as good as some of their first party games. You have no idea what you're talking about and this is a waste of my time. Instead of being a blind fanboy. Learn something about game development. Now if you read this you might wanna call me the same. But atleast i know what i'm talking about as i've done my research and you seem to be fetching for straws while countering with already disproven arguments.

That doesn't make his opinions right though.

Perhaps not, but given that they're making the most advanced console engine for a title that isn't exclusive that pretty much speaks for itself.

Orly ? So because it has big textures it's the most advanced ? Again. Research

Also. All your arguments are old and pretty much disproved. lol

More like you have no leverage and have run out of argument.

Research.

Hold on i'll say it again Research. You countered everything i said with something irrelevent to what i said. I assume that's because you couldn't counter it had you done your... Research. Or atleast you would have tried more intelligently.