| Kantor said: They would want to. They have refused to flat out deny a PS3 version. The moment they do that, I'll be happy to accept that it isn't coming. Even now, I consider it unlikely, and I'm not holding my breath for it. As for Sigma, that was only because Itagaki was a Sony hater, and he left. They saw potential for , so they made a game. Ninja Gaiden II didn't exactly sell brilliantly, while MGS4 did. And I don't see Kojima leaving any time soon. Why not get Ghostbusters on PS3? Isn't that a benefit of having two HD consoles? You're not getting it because of what Sony did? I'm sure it'll be awesome (except the environment design Kojima's love of Sony wouldn't blind him, though. He doesn't really care about the sales, he just wants to make the best game possible. If he can do that while making a multiplat for MGS5, he might well go ahead and do it (plus pressure from Konami). But MGS4 is never going to be on 360. It took three years to develop, some $60 million, and shipped around 4.5 million. Kojima optimised it to be on the PS3, and he's not going to go through the whole process again for en extra 10 sales. |
). Not sure if I'll get it.
Apparently Valve's president hates Sony, made a rather loud comment about it. Might not be Valve, well Left For Dead creator, you know who it is. Half-Life is on the mind. Anyway Orange box fell to the PS3, I know this lends to the case of Left For Dead to come on PS3, but can't the same be said for MGS4 to come on the 360, well anygame anyway?
Sigma was just an example, if not one of the most annoying.
I am getting ghostbusters on the 360 regardless lol but still pissed, i get single play multiplats on the 360, i prefer the controller, and i dunno as it was my first (hence my love for my sega mega drive) hd console I am just used to it, multiplat multis some go to the 360 some ps3, ps3 the ones where my bro in law plays, 360 others lol.
And this is not so much for the MGS4 360 rumour, i was sure when they announced touch, that was the chance to have it happen, i am just saying the chance is there for it to happen. I just think that if Bioware made an agreement with MS then it still has to stand even though EA bought them. EA did not just by the games, they bought the positives and negatives, ALSO they bought the promises made.
If it was that simple for a company to change their mind to what they signed on the dotted line, they would just sell themselves to a company then let themselves free, because realistically what a lot of this is trying to say, they are pulling at serious strings (both side of the argument, for the 360 and PS3).
If i got a tad confusing what i am trying to say is, if Bioware in fact signed on the dotted line saying Mass Effect's games are going to be exclusive on the 360 then that is what will happen. The company that buys them must fulfill all contractual agreements. If they buy the name of the company that owns the IP's.
