By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Smashchu2 on 16 May 2009
Edit Thread
BladeOfGod said:
Smashchu2 said:
BladeOfGod said:
ameratsu said:
ItsaMii said:
Wait a minute ...

disolitude, the guy who recommended Ninja Blade, Silent Hill Homecoming, Alone in the Dark and lots of other shitty games, is trying to tell Wii owners that they have a poor taste?

That is worse than the time a fan of Family Guy said my tastes in comedy suck.

And for me the Wii has a better library than the PS3 and Xbox 360 combined. It is still subpar compared to the Snes or PS2, but it is much better than the manchildren (sports, shooter and other "mature" games) machines.

 

Manchildren machines? That about tops all the elitist Wii garbage I've heard in a while. Oh and a member here (frybread) has a blog that sounds like it would be right up your alley:

http://fryfat.blogspot.com/

 

 What a retarded piece of shit blog. The only guy who is crying here is that idiot fryfat (nice name btw).

1.He says that Wii is only console worth of owning. Right there you can see what kind of idiot he is.

2. He's saying Killzone 2 is a flop but he doesnt say Halo Wars is flop even though Killzone 2 outsold Halo Wars.

3.Than he's bitching about how PS3 has weaker ports against 360. Most of those ports are from 2006 and 2007 and Eurogamer has ALWAYS BEEN pro 360 web site.And the difference are so small that you can only see them if you are fanboy. Most of good games look better on PS3 anyway ( COD4, Bioshock, GTAIVBe

4.Than he is attacking 360 and PS3 because of their great graphics. ( classic wii-fanboyish). He is acting like its hardcore gamers fault their systems are more powerful. If your system is the weakest on market dont attack others because of that!!!

5.Than he says how PS3 is unable to run many titles in HD (including big titles SFIV, RE5, GTA IV). Those titles WORK PERFECTLY ON BOTH HD CONSOLES!!!

6.Than he said PS3 is 600$ (something Sony haters always do even though they know whats the real price)

7.Than he says those ''10 reasons why PS3 is failing''  are valid even though they were disproved by many web sites on the web.

8.And than he says Party babyz is good game. He would obviously support any game as long as its on Wii and not made by Sony and Microsoft.

 

Seriously, one of the worst thing my eyes have ever saw

Some of those points were plan off. Let's begin....

  1. I will agree here, but in terms of hard numbers, he is correct. The Wii is selling better, has more titles, and will have a longer life. Still a fanboy
  2. No one harolded Halo Wars are the second coming of the 360. They did for KZ2 and the PS3. Halo 3, on the other hand, has beaten every other PS3 game.
  3. "Better" is so subjective that I'm not even going to try talking about it.
  4. I hit Ctrl+F and searched for the word "graphic" I was used only three times on the entire site. Everytime he did, though, he was parroting Malstrom saying how games are not about cinematics the two copnsoles are casualized PCs.
  5. I'll agree here
  6. OK, this is the worst part. He never said the word "six-hundred" on his blog. Not once. You shouldn't critizes someone if you are going to lie or use wrong information. Point six is pethetic.
  7. While, yes, some of these points were off, most of them were true. Yes, the system is too expensive. Yes, Sony is arrogent. Yes, the PS3 lacks a strong library (remember kids: software pushes hardware. The system wouldn't be in last place if it had a strong library of games people want). Yes, the killer-apps came too late (and were also weaker then those on the Wii and 360).
  8. I probably wouldn't play Party babies (at least he spelled it right, unlike yourself). However, he did play it, and he likes it. If you got mad at me for saying the PS3 doesn't have a good library and will post a list of games, then your a hypocrit.

Here is your problem guys. You are all looking at this backwards.

You say "He is a fanboy, he must be wrong." This is just ad homenin. In fact, if you read though the site, a good portion of his imformation is correct and he has correctly identified things PS3 fans keep denying. Now, I say "He is wrong becuase he is a fan boy." Not only did I not attack the messanger, but I was able to indetify a problem. By looking this way, I did not cloud my judgement (unlike the rest of you). In fact, becuase of this, I say he had some good points and some strong arguments. No one here tried to challange the arguments. They just called him an idiot.

Is he Malstrom? Hell no. Is he a fanboy? Yes. Is he wrong? No.

 

1.Ok, ''the wii is selling better'' arument is REALLY REALLY old. You people are using it every time when you try to win an argument. Wii sports sold better than Madworld, does that means Wii sports are better?

2.Well if almost new IP outsold the game with name HALO in it, ITS NOT a flop.

3.Try researching a bit about those games

4.That togehter with saying Wii is only console worth of owning because HD consoles are ''crippeld PCs'' And plus, he says that bulding PCs which can outperform 360 and even PS3 is CHEAP.

6.''Those are all valid issues of course, a $500 PS3 can't run a game better than a $200 360'' Hmm... weird. Sony hater still think the price is 500$-600$

7.Ok, this is the worst one.

1.For SOME people is, yes.

2.Sony's  arrogance pretty much ended when Ken Kuturagi left.

3.WHAT THE FUCK??? Almost every gaming web site agreed PS3 had strongest line up in 2008 and it probably has best line up in 2009. What does wii have??  Wii sports resort which  is re-make of the 3-year old game and...uhm... 360 has HALO ODST which is just a DLC. Anyway, saying which console has best libary is TOTALY based on your opinnion and nothing else.

 8. The game is CALLED PARTY BABYZ,so i DIDNT spelled it wrong
  1. So? If the argument is old, does not mean it's bad. In fact, it implies the argument is strong because it has been used so often. Now, the reason sale=quality is it acts like a statistic. If I ask you or someone else, they will give me two different answers about a game. Now, sales show how many people wanted that title, and they will tell their friends (increasing sales). So, it acts like a survey of what people though. How many titles are sold back to the store show hom many people were displeased. Simple.
  2. No, it's a flop becuase how how many journalist and fanboys hyped it up, and it under preformed. No to mention, your compairing KZ to a console RTS with no advertising. Face it, KZ2 under preformed.
  3. No. The reason I am not touching point 3 is because it is a value judgement. Go back to my point one and notice that I mentioned sales are quantifiable. I can not measure how much someone liked a title. Sales are a superior judge becuase they are quantifiable. You need to understand "better" is not an argument word. It's a word used by people who do not know how to argue.
  4. OGM, whaa whaaa. Quit crying. The 360 and PS3 ARE casualized PCs. Everything they do is trying to be like a PC. Heck, the PS3 can run Linex for Pete's sake. YES, you can probably build a better computer for cheaper (but I do not know this for fact). All you are doing is pulling at straws. He only said graphic 3 times and in relation to how they are a commodity (which is true).
  5. N/A
  6. Here is where I'm, going agree with Fryfat. There are too many modles for the same system. As such, I can not find the appropriate price, so I am going to agree with you. Now, here is my problem. This is not an argument. Boo Hooo, he said the system was $100 more then it is. WHY does this matter AT ALL. Why do Sony fanboys so sour over the system's price. They always have been. And you said 600. 600 was not on the site, meaning your still pethetic.
  7. I love how you are trying to rationalize this. Let's face reality. Sony has been really arrogant. It doesn't matter if they are less arrogant, they are still pretty so. Problem where when that was writen. The system is to expensive. It is still the most expensive unit on the market. I say the system does not have a strong line up because the system isn't being moved by these titles and there sales aren't going to be amazing. You also said that it is an opinion anyway. Your trying to prove a point. WHY use an opinion? Since my opinion can be different for no reason, you can't argue it. That fact that you are trying to refute these is bad, and you are not doing a good job.
  8. You are right. It is spelled "Party Babyz"

Here is what I find hypocritical. Your claiming him to be a fanboy, but your just as big a fanboy as he is, if not worse. At least he has quantifiable facts to back up his fanboyish arguments, where you still here crying infront of a computer screen because the system you like is failing both the consumers and the company. If you are going to use ad homenin on him, than I'm going to use it on you.