CGI-Quality said:
Garnett said:
No you didnt,He said "R2 is better looking than Gears 2",you said "Yes it is"And thats not name calling,im accusing you of being baised towards the PS3,if you READ what i put i said
"You always defend PS3 rarely 360,Actually FANBOY is the wrong word,Sorry but you FAVOR or more biased towards the PS3 more than the 360"
That means i was wrong for calling you a fanboy.
So are you gonna actually gonna admit that 360 has more games 80+?
On Topic -The graphics are nice but why does every dev say this game is only possible on PS3?
|
*sigh*............Even though this is pointless, I'll pull a quote of mine from that thread......
*Online*
 Message
 Add Friend
 My Codes
Posts: 5,946
vg$ 2,524.49
(12/28/08, 04:07)
@ Pristine20
Because Resistance 2 visually actually does things that Gears 2 did not unlike Gears 1 vs RFOM. That battle was EASILY won by Gears 1. However, Resistance 2 is another story. Textures obviously go to Gears of War 2 but scale is in Resistance 2's favor. In all out war: Gears of War 2 vs. Resistance 2 - Gears 2 wins by a slight margin. Regardless, besides Left 4 Dead and Fracture, Resistance 2 was my favorite shooter this year
Now, I said that Gears 2 won by a slight margin, but I still said it looked better, which it does. Resistance 2 I said was doing more, which having now played both, to me it does. Tell me, where in there do I sound like I'm sayin Resistance 2 looks better than Gears of War 2? Then tell me, why this was relevant to this thread?
Even though the 360 has more 80+ games than PS3, why would that affect me? I speak about quality, not quantity, and both consoles offer plenty of that. I don't need Metacritic for that either 
You shouldn't accuse someone of being biased when YOU, yourself, are guilty of that. The word hypocisy fits this, not trying to be ugly, but it does.
|
