BladeOfGod said:
Well, honestily i dont think Sony really gives a fuck which consle made the most profit for them as long as their division is profitable. And profit MS made in 2008 with 360 wasnt even 20% of the loss they made during 2 last years with 360 so 360 is also not profitable. If you lose 9 billion in 9 years and you made 260 million profit you are NOT profitable. Anyway this isnt about Xbox. I just wanted to point out that PlayStation is STILL profitable but if they continiue to lose money they wont be profitable anymore.That's all i wanted to say |
The division isn't profitable... companies don't work on past numbers, they work with what's happening now, and what will happen in the future.
The Xbox "brand" has pushed past it's losses, they are in the past.... the Playstation brand suffered a huge fuck-up with the PS3, to the point that if they had jumped out of te gaming business in 1999 they would have made more money than they have as of now. And the only reason it is still going is that the losses for the PS3 are decreasing enough that the PS2 and PSP will be able to prop up the division perhaps next fiscal year (ending 2011... although PS2 will probably be about dead by then so it will be the PSP propping up the PS3)
@dli2k3. By the end of this fiscal year yes, the PS3 could start turning a small profit.... but for the FY as a whole the PS3 section will still be in the red, that is pretty much certain given that it must have lost Sony over $1 billion this year (division lost 600mil, but PSP+PS2 will have made more than 400mil together)
So in 2 years time when we are reading the reports for FY ending March 2011 the PS3 might have finally had a profitable year.








