How many users on these boards actually support "The Theory of Evolution"?

[mrjuju]

Aquietguy said:

hsrob said:

What's wrong with 19th century science or 17th century science for that matter?  We still learn Newton's laws of motion in highschool physics and it is good enough to explain and predict motion in many common situations.

Explain to me how evolution is taken on just as much faith as Christianity.  Your whole post reeks of contradiction as you criticise evolutionary dogma and state it's reliance on faith without any evidence to back up your point. So we are to discard evolutionary dogma for your own? Natural selection at least has the good sense to put 'theory' in front of it to remind us that it is to be questioned and challenged, and not to be taken as infallible or unquestionable, unlike your point which we are expected to take on faith.

 

Most of what evolution is based is wrong by 20th century science. Even Darwin himself didn't take it as absolute truth. It's mostly a view for those who are atheist and need belief to where we come from. But where is all this supposed proof? It doesn't exist. 

 

 

0_0 ummm, not to be a dick or anything, but where is the proof for ID, or god for that matter? Because I  am fairly sure there is a far greater amount of evidence supporting the gradual adaptation and evolution of animals than a large, bearded man floating in the sky with his armies of winged cherubs.