Zizzla_Rachet on 13 May 2009
| Mendicate Bias said: So according to Uber really good graphics are innovation. Not only that but the advancement of graphics is the only thing that will push the fps genre forward. Ignoring the fact that your definition of innovation is wrong, seeing as how immersion is a completely subjective attribute that differs for each individual, the continued success of the wii and Halo 3 shows the serious flaws in your argument. Neither are pushing graphical standards in the least sense however both continue to be the fore front of success in their respective fields. The fact that your brush my arguments aside by calling me an xbot without offering a single counter argument to any of my points shows your immaturity. I'm not saying there won't be better looking games in the future but to use graphics as the standard for which to judge a shooter is laughably ignorant. It has been shown time and time again that gameplay and not graphics is the crucial factor in video games. In that respect COD4 and Halo 3 are both far beyond Killzone 2. Until you can come with an example of a game that sells better than previous blockbusters in the same genre based on graphics alone then your arguments are moot. Your objective in playing a video game may be to "immerse" your self but for the majority of gamers it's having fun. Once the fun starts the immersion soon follows, regardless of graphics. |
@Uber I dare you to say that people are no longer Playing Quake III :Arena.....Or Soldier Of Fourtune.....
KillZone 2 is a great game on it's on right....But the Majority of PS3 owners seems not to care.....I don't see KZ2 ever hitting 3 million lifetime....And if it does not hit 2 million before MW2 then good luck seeing that number......
@Bias... I doubt he will Accept that..I have Played Kill Zone 2...And I must say...2 of it's MP Maps make the game awesome...All the other maps I have played are horrible....That is not the case with COD4 and Halo 3
