NJ5 said:
You're making it look like this will turn into an international diplomatic disaster. Maybe World War 3 even? Your posts are becoming thread spam. You keep repeating the same thing, not yet having explained why this case is such a big deal when similar ones (especially Microsoft's) haven't caused any trouble before. Not just that but USA's regulators are saying they'll get harder on companies, opening the possibility Intel gets fined again.
|
First off, this isn't like the California vs. M$ case, and I pointed out the key differences, even if you don't understand or agree with them. Second, this isn't going to turn into WWIII, but I'll be surprised with the US Gov't doesn't get involved, because this is a foreign government regulating two US companies against each other. It's about precedence, and that makes it a big deal...don't believe me, turn on your TV now, and check out Bloomberg, or CNBC, or whatever...it's HUGE news. Third, I don't see the substance of the case against Intel...and how this applies to EU consumers. Exactly what laws were broken in the EU...since Intel giving nice deals to Dell...two US companies, btw, doesn't really fall under EU purview, imho. Now, the Electronics retailer might be a example, but they would need clear proof of direct Intel tampering, not innuendos. BTW, can you provide some concrete data to show how US regulators are cracking down on a company making harder for a rival to compete, in this manner?








