ssj12 said:
I'm still not to sure Intel has tried to monopolize anything. I thinks its because Intel has just been around for a while and had great products across the spectrum that they got so big. If AMD really wanted to compete they would try to develop their own technologies rather than base their their entire line of CPUs off technologies owned by the competitor. Unlike the Microsoft case I have a feeling Intel might be close to innocent here. They might have offered incentives but companies could have easily said no to them. In the end why isn't the manufacturers who took the incentives/bribes in trouble? |
Looks like the Obama Administration is going to get a fight from an unexpected avenue...to protect US Business, this shit is definitely not going to go down. All I see it EU taxing a US company for being successful...If I'm Intel, I'm looking at hte US Govt and pointing out that people will have to get fired to pay for this "fine"...aka shakedown. Guess that's a way to get some stimulus funds to EU.








