Kasz216 on 03 October 2007
| PlagueOfLocust said: You missed the point quite effectively. Substitute "what we can see" with "what we can physically sense" (hear, taste, smell, touch, and see, including what any instrumentation allows any of these senses to decipher) and the argument stands the same. |
Actually there are some things that we know exist that we can't see, smell, taste, touch or see.
Things we haven't directly observed because we can't but have observed by observing their effects. Like Dark Energy... and some elements on the periodic table, though they may have gotten around to making all of the ones we haven't seen in labratories at this point. I'm not sure.
