Kasz216 on 03 October 2007
| PlagueOfLocust said: Yes, your technical point doesn't really contribute. But interesting. "...homosexuality, something that does naturally occur" That part I like. I like how something that "occurs" must, therefore, be natural. Murder must be natural, or at least we should think of it in a positive light (not comparing murder to homosexuality in terms of severity; just highlighting your logical error). Even better: "even in places without nuns", as if your point is that somehow homosexuality is more natural than a nun fetish because homosexuality existed before nun-fetishes. (It's as human as apple-pie, by golly!) Aside from that not making sense, since a nun-fetish obviously wouldn't exist before nuns... there have always been men, so that's why homosexuality occurred at any given point in history. Again, occurrence does not prove naturality. And neither does desire, since there are unnatural desires. I'm well out of WTF territory. I wouldn't commit to an argument I couldn't reasonably defend. |
i'd say homosexuality is natrual because it happens in animals as well.
Of course calling it a genetic "defect" wouldn't be wrong either. It's a bit insulting but it does hurt a gay persons chances at having children, though modern options like adoption and the whole getting people pregnant without having sex thing seems to have "fixed" most of that.
So you could say my mind is more of a defect because I just don't want a kid period.
