| JUG said: I've been reading the recent revelations on vgchartz top 100 countdown with interest, and I noticed that lots of people seem to have said something along the lines of "at least game x wasn't beaten by GTA 4!". It's fair to say that GTA 4 got stellar critical reviews when it came out, and I thought it was a fantastic game. But it was the first GTA I've ever played, so I was wondering if I was missing something here. Did most gamers actually think GTA 4 was massively overrated? |
i liked it it was better than all gtas graphix and realsim wise i liked the new approach to the driving physics and is the only sandbox game with a very good cover system or a cover system in general
i didnt like the missing features form SA and even VC the tanks planes jets parachutes safe houses with garages that can hold more than 2 cars and more but im 100% sure that the next gta will have all these and if u compare gta4 with gta3 than gta4 wast missing out on alot and thats wat gta4 should be compared 2
if u didnt play the past gtas vice city and SA then u missed out on alot of things gta4 didnt have it might be hard for u to go back now after playing 4 but if u could gtaSA was a near perfect game i would give it a 9.8 for its time
i would give gat4 a 8.8 for its time and RE4 a 9 and RE5 a 8.1
Play Me
