Bitmap Frogs said:
With regards to negroes living in California, the odds of a random negro being involved in crime is high enough that it warrants an inspection. So the fact they have customers for their illegal business shows willful disrespect for the law. Be careful with that argument, it can be twisted to justify all kinds of vulnerations of civil rights. |
Yeah, you're kind of misunderstanding the logic there.
Hiring an employee or selling alcohol to a customer both are similar in that you must make sure the receivers are legaly eligable. You migh not card some grey haired old looking guy when you sell alcohol, as chances are very slim he is under 21.
When I hinted at a desire for jail time, I'm not talking in "years". Threaten someone with 30 days jail, and I bet they'll be checking work eligability very carefuly. Lots of minor offences allow for jail time, but judges discretion rarely puts people there. 30 days jail, 30 days suspended is a "stern judical warning" where you serve no jail time as long as you keep you nose clean those 30 days.
How ever I feel much more severe penalties are needed to prevent the hiring of illegals in some cases, because of the sheer scope of the problem some places.
Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
— Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire







