Sony Gives 64 Million Gamers the Finger

[TheSteve]

CGI-Quality said:

TheSteve said:

CGI-Quality said:

TheSteve said:

CGI-Quality said:

rgame1 said:
over a lame....ghostbusters game?

I'm sorry, have you played it yet? If so, how long is it? What are the graphics like, the story?

If you have no answers for these questions, I suggest not judging something before you've played it.

Good day now

 

 

 Hey, he's probably seen the pics in the magazines, and just didn't see the yogurt in the franchise.

That ridiculous analogy was old before you came to this thread. You can't defend someone for bashing something they haven't played.

 

It depends on if he thinks it's lame because of the gameplay (which he can't) or because it's Ghostbusters.  There are plenty of folks that dislike Mario, Sonic, Master Chief, and a number of other games, regardless of the quality, simply because they think the subject matter is "lame."  If he thinks the Ghostbusters, themselves, are lame, and considers that quality transferable to any licensed property regarding them, then you can't persecute him.

 

I think saying: "over a lame ghostbusters game" is enough to persecute because he's judging something he hasn't touched. Why are you disputing this? He didn't say: "the Ghostbusters franchise is lame, or "I dislike Ghostbusters" or even that the game is not something he's excited for. He said that the GAME is lame. It's the same as if he'd said the game is the best, you can't know that until you've played it.

I swear, I'm wasting my time........

...and mine, but hey, I'm at work and I'm pretty sure that's what this forum is for.

He CAN say it's lame if the REASON it's lame is that it's a "Ghostbuster's game"...  He has qualified the statement via the inclusion of the type of game.  You are making an assumption in order to attack him for what YOU believe to be the proper way to judge something, and then telling me I can't "defend" him by saying he might not mean what you think he means...  You seem to consider yourself some kind of authority on what is right and wrong in the world of pointless internet discussion, but so do we all, and thus we all consider one another wrong.