The said:
How any presentation displaying a large and promising line-up of future releases can be considered "inferior" is beyond my comprehension. Yes, we've known quite a few details and even seen gameplay for many of those games on the list, so? Does that make them any less exciting or promising? I've known there's a game called "The Agency" since ages ago, I've seen pictures and trailers, but do I know a fuck about it? no. That applies to any of those games. I believe I know as much of God of War 3 as I know of MAG, which is mostly just developer/journalist talk. The hell if they only show what's already known for months to be coming out. Does anyone really know anything concrete about Heavy Rain? I say give me a strong showing of Heavy Rain, GT5, GOW3, U2, MAG, etc. and release dates, and I'll be a lot happier than if they were to "surprise me" with so-called "up sleeve aces" which from the time of their unveiling (a DEMO VIDEO), are nothing but smoke in the air, until they are hopefully released (very likely in the long unforeseeable future on the NEXT DECADE) and could very well turn out to be garbage (worst case scenario) in the end. |
I wasn't saying it IS inferior... Just that, with all of this "old news", a handful of "POOF!! We saved this for E3!!" announcements from Nintendo and Microsoft will overshadow their presentation. Thus my use of the terms "will look" and "think". The gaming press coverage is going to read "Sony: nothing new here... OMGWTF!! Nintendo announces motion controls!!!"
Believing in the PLAYSTATION®3......IS.......S_A_C_R_I_L_E_G_E







