By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zizzla_Rachet said:
gergroy said:
thekitchensink said:
Jo21 said:
FreeTalkLive said:
Nintendo has lost generations (not come in 1st place) but it has never come in last place.

Anyway, I don't think MS can win next generation and certainly not profit wise. I'm not even sure if Nintendo will sell the most consoles next generation, but it will likely make more profit than MS.

 

gamecube was last.

 

 Dreamcast doesn't exist?

well, considering the fact that the dreamcast was being liquidated when gamecube and xbox were released, It's hard to include it in that generation.  It really was only on the market with the ps2 for a year, and it really didn't even share the market with gamecube or xbox.  I think it makes more sense to include dreamcast in the previous generation.  it was out a year before the ps2, so it competed with the ps1 and n64 more than it did ps2, xbox, and gamecube.

 

 

So the Sega Satrun does not exist now?

can a company not have more than one console per generation? especially when said company only has those consoles on the market for like 2 years?