Shadowblind said:
naznatips said:
benmanu said:
mrstickball said:
The thing about SO4 coming to the PS3 is:
We've only seen a few 360 JRPGs goto the PS3: Enchanted Arms (which was by a dev that worked quite a bit on PS titles), Eternal Sonata, and Tales of Vesperia (soon).
The issue is that ToV was semi-inevitable, given the fact that Eternal Sonata shares the same engine as ToV.
If SO4 was to come to the PS3, the precursor would be IU to the PS3. And that hasn't been announced yet. Not a good sign for a troll like PS3beats360. |
are you sure that tov and es share the same engine? because if it the fact, then why eternal sonata background are much much much much more detailed than tov's? If tov and es share the same engine, then es is using it better than tov.
As for the iu case, perhaps it's a rumor but i've heard it was somehow "paid" by microsoft.
|
More importantly Stickball is full of it, because IU was published by MS, making it second party (which he knows very well), and SO4 was not.
|
Wrong. Microsoft does not hold any publishing rights to Infinite Undiscovery. Square Enix bought them:
http://search.ign.com/products?query=infinite+undiscovery
http://www.gamershell.com/companies/square_enix_co_ltd_/492424.html
@benmanu: Yes, ToV and Eternal Sonata are said to have shared the same engine.
|
squareenix does not need to buy the right, tri ace was part of enix and is then a part of squareenix, all tri ace games'rights apart end of eternity (whose rights are for sega) are squareenix's property.
When you think about it, i did not expect squareenix to give tri ace so much freedom that they can do games for another firm...
