@ Kasz216
your post started so well, then you went back to "religous peeps > atheist peeps"
you cannot make that argument from an un-biased logical starting viewpoint, nor can i (nor have i or will i do so) claim that "atheist peeps > religous peeps"
i can only say that i feel that i am right about god not existing, just as you can only say that religous people feel they are right
its not a black and white debate, there can be no winner until we can prove either that God 100% does exist or 100% does not, i know this, why dont you?
Edit: specifically on the issue at hand, you cannot claim that religous people are more altruistic, as it dosent work like that, either people can be altruistic or they cant, id argue that altruism dosent exist, so neither side can be more or less something that dosent exist.
