AussieGecko said:
How so? Microsoft made vista and people are complaining that they put an easy chance for people to chose ie. Where as if sony put a competitor to PAID units, as opposed MS putting a competitor for FREE browsers. How is it fair for the opposition. You could say its different because not everyone has sony tv's, well especially not the percentage of vista/xp/ microsoft operating systems. But we can't really have different devices for companies just because they are more successful. In honesty i have nothing against Sony ps3's, or their tv's. As a matter of fact i have both, but the bravia's are too expensive at the moment, to OT, In theory good idea. In practice though not so good, corporate issues would prevent such a thing. In Australia we have ACCC (australian consumer... something commission.) I am sure that america has something like that, same as Japan and it just wouldn't allow it. It is just too much competion. |
I was just saying that it's much easier to simply buy a different brand TV without a PS3 integrated into it if you don't want it rather than using a whole other operating system because of IE.







