By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IllegalPaladin said:
AussieGecko said:
Its kinda dumb, a lot of people are bitching about ie being built into ms.

If the same argument happens, it shouldn't have even be bought into consideration.

 

I'm not saying I'm for or against the topic being proposed, but I think Windows and Internet Explorer are different than Sony integrating a video game console inside some of their TV's.

 

How so?

Microsoft made vista and people are complaining that they put an easy chance for people to chose ie. Where as if sony put a competitor to PAID units, as opposed MS putting a competitor for FREE browsers.

How is it fair for the opposition.

You could say its different because not everyone has sony tv's, well especially not the percentage of vista/xp/ microsoft operating systems. But we can't really have different devices for companies just because they are more successful.

In honesty i have nothing against Sony ps3's, or their tv's. As a matter of fact i have both, but the bravia's are too expensive at the moment, to OT, In theory good idea. In practice though not so good, corporate issues would prevent such a thing. In Australia we have ACCC (australian consumer... something commission.) I am sure that america has something like that, same as Japan and it just wouldn't allow it. It is just too much competion.



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752