BMaker11 said:
Falcon095 said:
Jo21 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Jo21 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Right. FF is third party. Sony doesn't have control over them. Neither does MS. You blaming an uninvolved party like Microsoft is a bit rediculous. I can easily throw blame in a thousand directions, but when it comes down to it, it comes down to being Square's problem, and Square's fault. If Square had started 360 development earlier, they would have had a build to make the demo from wouldn't they? If they had started to localize the game earlier, they'ed have the translation done for the demo already wouldn't they? Ultimately, it was Square's decision to release or not release the demo. They chose not to. Whatever their reasonings are don't really matter. The bottom line is they could have released it, and they chose not to.
Are you the type of person that regularly blames other people for problems they aren't responsible for? If I have a school assignment to do and I procrastinate all week, under the assumption I'll do it last minute, and then someone I know gets hospitalized causing me to not get my work done on time, who's fault is that? Is it the hospitalized person or is it me the procrastinator? There were many instances where Square could have taken a different course of action. However it was their action to take, not Microsoft's. When you show me the gun held to Wada's head, I'll concede and say it was all Microsoft's fault.
|
sadly i can't proof that, yet, but this time around kitasate said themself it not being unfair to 360 owners. true square choice, but thing that would have never happen if 360 version didn't exist, like it should.
|
How do you do it? You admit it being Square's choice and then go back to blaming Microsoft. How can it be Microsoft's fault if Square has a choice? I feel like I'm banging my head against a brick wall here.
|
because 360 version its holding it up, square didn't had to make that choice if the port didnt' exist, which likely comes with NDA Deal with microsoft.
reason why it can't be released in NA before in the ps3 even if the ps3 version it's finish first.
and trust me i would be blaming sony if they were the ones holding up the american release.
just happens its microsoft known for their shoddy practices.
|
Why don't you blame Sony then, they are the ones that decided to make a expensive and difficult to develop console, and they didn't offer anything to stop FFXIII becoming multiplatform, remember what Sony did with FFVII? They offered Square a better deal, this time the tables are turn and MS is the one that offered better a deal. If you are gonna "blame" and "hate" like that you better stop being in love with Sony.
|
By.....having a disc based medium, so they could realize the game they wanted instead of having it be held back by a cartridge?
|
BS, the N64 cartidge had better graphics and less load times but it was too damn expensive and had less space, what does that mean? That they had to release a game with many cartridges and it could be very expensi = less money for Square. Sony offered a cheaper way to make a game (and a ridiculous marketing campaign) so they accepted and Nintendo didn't do anything to stop it, this time, MS offered a deal to have a bigger market and other things that we don't know (possibly a couple of millions) and Sony didn't do anything.
