| CAL4M1TY said: Not sure why I clicked in this thread, discussions about GT's comparison videos never turn out well. Incidently, for all those people claiming the GT is biased against Sony, was it because you yourselves thought that the PS3 side did in fact look worse than the 360? and that it must have been tampering by GT to make it so? |
If I recall correctly, the GRID video made a big deal of the PS3 version looking like ass, which was pretty funny when someone noticed that the PS3 version was being shown as the 360 version.
What got me started on the blatant bias that GT does was the Assassin's Creed video. They showed a clip of (forget his name, the old guy that tells you what to do) where it cuts it in half for the two systems and zooms in a couple times. The main focus is that of his eyes; the 360 side has a nice detailed eye, and the PS3 version has this horrible looking eye like it's missing. The obvious conclusion anyone would draw while viewing this is that the PS3 version has far less detail. But in truth, the character has a screwed up eye.
When I saw that, it sure seemed a little biased, but when I saw that mess of a video for GRID, it became far more clear.
So no, I don't claim bias because I thought it looked worse, I claim bias because of the evidence.
