| Vetteman94 said: Fixed for you again So IMO BS it is. IMO An analog stick can move quickly from one side of the screen to the other, it just takes a quick flick of my thumb. You keep saying instantly like the Wiimote can do it without even moving, when itn fact you have to move your wrist to do it. Probably the same distance I have to move my thumb on the analog stick. Again, if this was such an obvious advantage, then why arent the hardcore FPS gamers on the Wii and why arent there more FPS games on the Wii. BECAUSE IMO IT IS BS.
|
See we can both do that.
By all means stay closed off to reality. Most console FPS gamers (including you) are part of the "old guard" of gaming and will always resist change at every step. The Wii has revived point&click games and rail-shooters only because of it's superior pointer input. By your logic why aren't all FPS console gamers playing FPS on computer, or are you going to tell me that dual-analog is better than mouse/keyboard also? Anyone that has had experience playing all 3 types of inputs can easily tell you that dual-analog is not the pinnacle of control in FPS's. If PS3 had launched with a pointer device and not dual analog we wouldn't even be having this conversation. One day you'll take off your tinted glasses. I'm now finished having a futile "conversation" with you.
Smash Bros: 2363-5325-6342 
